Smith v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHANNELL, J.
In this case of first impression, we are asked to determine the constitutionality of section 2292 of the Business and Professions Code, 1 authorizing the Board of Medical Quality Assurance 2 to compel a physician to undergo a professional competency examination. Respondent board, without first granting appellant John Phillip Smith, M.D., the right to appear at its hearing, ordered him to undergo this examination. On appeal, Smith contends, inter alia, that the board’s procedure denied him equal protection and due process. We reject these contentions and affirm the trial…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Hannah v. LarcheSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- People v. Eric J.California Supreme Court · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Arnett v. Dal CieloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Luck v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Ryan v. California Interscholastic Federation-San Diego SectionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Benton v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Traverso v. People Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.