Legal Opinion

Smith v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 1988No. A038881PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHANNELL, J.

In this case of first impression, we are asked to determine the constitutionality of section 2292 of the Business and Professions Code, 1 authorizing the Board of Medical Quality Assurance 2 to compel a physician to undergo a professional competency examination. Respondent board, without first granting appellant John Phillip Smith, M.D., the right to appear at its hearing, ordered him to undergo this examination. On appeal, Smith contends, inter alia, that the board’s procedure denied him equal protection and due process. We reject these contentions and affirm the trial…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Hannah v. LarcheSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. People v. Eric J.California Supreme Court · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Arnett v. Dal CieloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Luck v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Ryan v. California Interscholastic Federation-San Diego SectionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Benton v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Traverso v. People Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API