Hayes v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
The City of Seattle obtained review of a decision of the Court of Appeals affirming the Superior Court’s grant of a summary judgment in favor of Michael Hayes and against Seattle. We affirm the Court of Appeals, albeit for reasons that differ from those given by that court, concluding that the Superior Court correctly determined that Hayes should be awarded damages pursuant to RCW 64.40 for arbitrary and capricious action of the Seattle City Council.
In November 1987, Michael Hayes applied to Seattle’s Department of Construction and Land Use (DCLU) for a *709master use permit in order to allow…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- A. v. Costantini v. Trans World Airlines and Does I Through XcCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Rains v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Hume v. American Disposal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Hibbard v. Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca & O'HernWashington Supreme Court · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Spokane Research & Defense Fund v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- SPOKANE RESEARCH FUND v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.