Legal Opinion

SPOKANE RESEARCH FUND v. City of Spokane

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 2005No. 75577-9PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

117 P.3d 1117 (2005)

SPOKANE RESEARCH & DEFENSE FUND, a Washington nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff,

Tim Connor; Rhubarb Sky LLC, Petitioners,

v.

CITY OF SPOKANE, a Washington first class charter city, Respondent.

No. 75577-9.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued June 7, 2005.

Decided August 11, 2005.

John David Blair-Loy, San Diego, CA, Nancy A. Pacharzina, Tousley Brain Stephens, PLLC, Seattle, for Petitioners.

Laurel Hobbs Siddoway, David Groesbeck, Randall & Danskin PS, Spokane, for Respondent.

Shelley Marie Hall, Stokes Lawrence, Seattle, for Amicus Curiae (Allied Daily Newspapers of…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. James Miller v. United States Department of StateCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  3. Hearst Corp. v. HoppeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. Soter v. Cowles Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Soter v. Cowles Pub. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE OF SPOKANE v. SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2011

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API