Legal Opinion
Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 24, 2004No. 73357-1PublishedCited by 222 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.
In this case, we determine that Washington’s Minimum Wage Act (MWA), ch. 49.46 RCW, applies to a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) containing a onetime retroactive payment based on an hourly wage of actual hours worked, and that this lawsuit is not preempted by section 301 (§ 301) of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, Pub. Law No. 101, ch. 120, 61 Stat. 136 (1947) (LMRA), codified at 29 U.S.C. § 185(a), or barred by res judicata. We affirm the Court of Appeals and grant respondents costs and attorney fees.
I. FACTS
Petitioner, Todd Pacific Shipyards Corporation, constructs and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Rains v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Kruse v. HempWashington Supreme Court · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by222 opinions
- Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Elcon Construction, Inc. v. Eastern Washington UniversityWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Owen v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe RR Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Owen v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. USF InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2008
217 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.