Spokane Research & Defense Fund v. City of Spokane
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Sanders, J.
This case arises under the public disclosure act (PDA), chapter 42.17 RCW. Tim Connor and Rhubarb Sky, L.L.C., intervenors/petitioners, seek reversal of a published Court of Appeals opinion affirming the superior court’s dismissal of their claims and denial of fees, costs, and sanctions for the alleged PDA violations. We reverse and also deny the city’s motion to dismiss this appeal as moot or otherwise barred.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2 In January 2000, Tim Connor, an independent reporter,1 filed a PDA request with the city of Spokane for, inter alia, “all memos, emails,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- James Miller v. United States Department of StateCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Hearst Corp. v. HoppeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by114 opinions
- SPOKANE RESEARCH FUND v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Soter v. Cowles Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Soter v. Cowles Pub. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.