Legal Opinion

Hescock v. ZON. BD. OF APP. OF TOWN OF STONINGTON

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 20, 2009No. AC 29316PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVINE, J.

The plaintiffs, William H. Hescock and Regina C. Hescock, appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their appeal from the decision by the defendant zoning board of appeals of the town of Stonington (board) granting an application for a variance submitted by the defendants Carol Holt and Thompson Wyper. The plaintiffs claim that the court improperly (1) concluded that the approval of the defendants’ coastal site plan review application was supported by substantial evidence in the record, (2) concluded that the board complied with local flood zone regulations and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Adolphson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Celentano v. Oaks Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. Goldberg v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  5. DeBeradinis v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Komondy v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  2. Goodspeed Airport, LLC v. Town of East HaddamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. MSO, LLC v. DeSIMONEConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  4. Swiconek v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Superior Court · 2009
  5. 347 Humphrey Street, LLC v. Board of Zoning AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API