Legal Opinion
Baldauf v. Amoco Oil Co.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided August 31, 1981No. G 81-72PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENSLEN, District Judge.
This case involves provisions for notification of termination of non-renewal of the franchise relationship of the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2801 et seq. It is before the Court on cross Motions for Summary Judgment and Defendant’s counterclaim. Plaintiffs contend that Defendant has not complied with the requirements of the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act and contest Amoco’s decision to convert to their full service gas station and associated auto repair shop into a high volume “pumper” type gasoline station to the exclusion of other…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Munno v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
- Ambook Enterprises v. Time Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Davy v. Murphy Oil Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1980
- Pearman v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1979
- Ferriola v. Gulf Oil Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Ewing v. Amoco Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- May-Som Gulf, Inc. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- David P. Valentine v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- C.T. Massey D/B/A C.T. Massey Oil Company B.W. Lyons Oil Co. v. Exxon Corporation D/B/A Exxon Company, U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Connie K. HAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, a New York Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.