In Re Estate of Heberle
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying a partial distribution of the estate of a deceased person. G. A. Gibbs, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Milton K. Young, F. E. Lacey, and Denis & Loewenthal, for Appellants. Lee, Scott & Chase, Murphy & Schmidt, Edward F. Wehrle, and H. G. Weyse, for Respondents.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an appeal from an order sustaining, without leave to amend, demurrers to the petition of Jacob Heberle and Eva Dickhof for partial distribution to them, as heirs at law, of a portion of the estate of George Heberle, deceased, it being the contention of petitioners that as to this portion he died intestate. The petitioners’ status as heirs at law is not in question. The only question is whether or not from a construction of the will of deceased intestacy resulted as to the property in controversy.
The deceased by his will, after directing the payment of his debts and funeral…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re Estate of WalkerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- In Re the Estate of FairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Estate of Dunphy v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- In re Estate of CavarlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Sanford v. SanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Estate of NorthcuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Hunsinger v. LandgrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- In Re Estate of SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- In Re Estate of WillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Spriggs v. SpriggsMontana Supreme Court · 1924
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.