Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Cavarly

California Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1897No. S. F. No. 770PublishedCited by 26 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and' County of San Francisco making partial distribution of the «state of a deceased person. J. Y. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

John M. Cavarly died in 1895 testate. The will was admitted to probate and letters testamentary were issued to the Union Trust Company of San Francisco in accordance with the terms of the will.

The estate as appraised consisted of personal property of the value of fifty thousand three hundred and sixty-three dollars and forty-one cents, and real property valued at thirty-seven thousand two hundred and ten dollars.

After some small legacies the testator attempted to dispose of the remaining estate as follows: “Fourth. All the rest, residue, and remainder of the estate, property, and effects,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McFarland v. PicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. McCray v. Citizens Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. De Vries v. De VriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. Savela v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  5. Estate of TroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API