Legal Opinion

Sanford v. Sanford

California Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1902No. S.F. Nos. 2764-2797PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court..

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

S. F. No. 2764 is an appeal by Charles F. Sanford, an heir at law of the decedent, from that part of the decree of distribution which distributes one fourth of the Rancho Los Meganos to Mary Sanford and Huntington Sanford, subject to a certain trust declared in the twenty-ninth paragraph of decedent’s will. S. F. No. 2797 is an appeal by the same appellant from an order denying his motion to vacate the decree and grant a new trial of the petition for final distribution.

In the twenty-fifth, twenty-sixth, twenty-seventh, and twenty-eighth paragraphs the testatrix says, “I give and bequeath” to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re the Estate of FairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Campbell-Kawannanakoa v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Lauricella v. LauricellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Estate of Dunphy v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. In Re the Estate of PeabodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. In Re Estate of SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API