Legal Opinion

Estate of Dunphy v. Dunphy

California Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1905No. S.F. No. 4086PublishedCited by 51 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

The plaintiff is the daughter and one •of the heirs at law of William Dunphy, deceased; the other heirs of said deceased are the defendants, Carmen 0. Dunphy, his surviving wife; Jennie C. Dunphy, another ■daughter; James C. Dunphy, a son; and Viola Piercy, a minor child of a deceased daughter of said decedent. The defendant, Jennie C. Dunphy, is guardian of said Viola. This action was brought by plaintiff under section 1664 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for the purpose of having the rights of all persons claiming heirship, ownership, or interest in the estate of said deceased judicially…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of FairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. In re Estate of SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Estate of ReithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Sanford v. SanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Ward v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Colden v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Stiebel v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Keating v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Estate of McCarthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API