Fall v. State Bar

THE COURT

By writ of review, the petitioner has challenged a recommendation of disbarment made by the Board of Governors of The State Bar after the adoption, with certain modifications, of the findings of fact of a local administrative committee; The petitioner contends that the findings, as amended, are not sustained by the evidence and that they do not- support the conclusion of professional misconduct justifying discipline.

The petitioner, admitted to practice in 1928, maintains offices at San Pedro. The charges of The State Bar are based upon acts assertedly done by him as attorney for the…