Hurlbut v. Quigley
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court,
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The plaintiff, the defendant, and William Trebilcock became accommodation indorsers upon a promissory note for six thousand dollars, payable to the First National Bank of Central City. The plaintiff was, by suit, compelled to pay the whole thereof. He thereupon brought the present action to recover from Quigley one-third of the amount he -had thus been compelled to pay and recovered judgment in the court below. From this judgment the defendant appeals.
The complaint alleged that the Gilpin Lumber Company executed a note to the First National Bank of Central City, bearing date July 10, 1911,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chipman v. Morill & WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Heard v. Dubuque County BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
- McDonald v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Hemmenway v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
- Richter v. HenningsanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tucker v. NicholsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Dabney v. DabneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Pacific Freight Lines v. Pioneer Express Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- MacOmb v. Extension Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1950
- Jaronko v. CzerwinskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.