Legal Opinion

Jaronko v. Czerwinski

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 5, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The complaint alleged that on January 17th, 1931, the defendant Czerwinski executed to The Polish Investment & Loan Co., Inc., his note for $600 payable $12 per week with a provision that upon default in any one payment the whole amount should become due with attorney’s fees or other charges or expenses for collection. The defendants Begay, Tercyak, Duszak, and Pananski and the plaintiff “endorsed the said note” for Czerwinski, who failed to make the payments according to the tenor of the note and the payee exercised its power to demand full payment. Notice of demand was sent to the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Trego v. Estate of CunninghamIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Noble v. Beeman-Spaulding-Woodward Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
  3. German American Savings Bank v. HannaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Weeks v. ParsonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  5. Beardsley v. HawesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Adolph Ramish, Inc. v. WoodruffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Newark Finance Corp. v. AcocellaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. O'Neal v. PeadenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Savings Bank of New Britain v. WeedConnecticut Superior Court · 1935
  5. Upton v. Heiselt Const. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API