Richter v. Henningsan
California Supreme Court
Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. J. R. Webb, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
This is an action to enforce contribution by defendants as stockholders in the FruitvaleWine and Fruit Company, a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the state of California, on account of money paid by the assignor of plaintiff upon a judgment against the stockholders in said corporation, and in favor of the United States, for eighteen hundred and twenty-seven dollars and forty cents, due to the United States as a balance on a tax of ninety cents per gallon upon the distillation of five thousand five hundred and eighty-six gallons of brandy and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gibbons v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Plimpton v. . BigelowNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Riggs v. Commercial Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Kohl v. LilienthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Warren v. Davenport Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Phillips-Jones Corp. v. ParmleySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Knapp v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Jackson v. LacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Arp v. BlakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Dillon Implement Co. v. CleavelandUtah Supreme Court · 1906
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.