Dowling v. Conniff
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
Action to enforce payment of an assessment for work done on a crossing of two main streets (Tenth and Harrison) in the city of San Fran*76cisco. The work to be done, and which was done by plaintiff, was described in the resolution of intention as follows:
“That the roadway of the crossing of Tenth and Harrison streets be paved with basalt blocks (except that portion required by law to be kept in order by the railroad company having tracks thereon) and that granite cross-walks be laid thereon.”
The plaintiff on the trial offered as evidence his warrant, the diagram of the lots assessed,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McDonald v. ConniffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Perine v. ErzgraberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Himmelmann v. HoadleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Frick v. MorfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by8 opinions
- Smith v. LightstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Buckman v. LandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Wells v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Bates v. HadamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- De Haven v. BerendesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.