Wells v. Wood
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. J. C. B. Hebbard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
Action to enforce lien of street assessment in the sum of one hundred and one dollars and forty-six cents for labor and material performed and furnished by plaintiff’s assignor under contract with the superintendent of streets in improving Mission street, in the city of San Francisco, from Courtland avenue to West avenue. The judgment was in favor of the plain*256tiff for the sum demanded, and defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
1. On the trial defendant proved that the portion of Mission street to which said contract related had…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McDonald v. ConniffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Perine v. ForbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Diggins v. HartshorneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Warren v. RiddellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- McVerry v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Irish v. HahnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. CristCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Bates v. HadamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Beckett v. MorseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906