Frick v. Morford
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying a petition for a writ of mandate. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The plaintiffs applied to the superior court of Los Angeles County for a writ of mandate to the superintendent of streets of the city of Los Angeles, directing him to make an assessment for certain work done by them in laying a sewer in Seventh Street, under a contract "with the city authorities. In their application they aver that they entered into a contract with the superintendent of streets, by which they agreed to lay *578the sewer “in accordance with plans and specifications therefor on file in the office of the city surveyor, . . . . but said plans and specifications were'faulty and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Himmelmann v. HoadleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Boyle v. HitchcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Smith v. CofranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chase v. City Treasurer of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- McLaughlin v. KnoblochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Perine v. ForbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Smith v. LightstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Dowling v. ConniffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.