Legal Opinion

State v. Boyd

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 25, 2001No. 1 CA-CR 00-0761PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EHRLICH, Judge

¶ 1 Steven David Boyd appeals his conviction for driving with a suspended license while having a dangerous drug or its metabolite in his body. He claims that he was not afforded his right to due process because he lacked notice that the substance he ingested is a dangerous drug. We agree, finding the statute unconstitutional as applied to Boyd, and we therefore reverse his conviction.

FACTS1 AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 At approximately 12:30 p.m. on December 28, 1999, a man who was driving southbound on 19th Avenue in Phoenix watched a man later identified as Boyd driving a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. State v. GuerraArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. State v. CotaArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State v. CotaArizona Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State of Arizona Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Hrach ShilgevorkyanArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State ex rel. Montgomery v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  3. People v. BOULTINGHOUSECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. State v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. Az Petition Partners LLC v. Hon. thompson/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API