State v. Boyd
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EHRLICH, Judge
¶ 1 Steven David Boyd appeals his conviction for driving with a suspended license while having a dangerous drug or its metabolite in his body. He claims that he was not afforded his right to due process because he lacked notice that the substance he ingested is a dangerous drug. We agree, finding the statute unconstitutional as applied to Boyd, and we therefore reverse his conviction.
FACTS1 AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 At approximately 12:30 p.m. on December 28, 1999, a man who was driving southbound on 19th Avenue in Phoenix watched a man later identified as Boyd driving a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. GuerraArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- State v. CotaArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. CotaArizona Supreme Court · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State of Arizona Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Hrach ShilgevorkyanArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- State ex rel. Montgomery v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. BOULTINGHOUSECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- State v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Az Petition Partners LLC v. Hon. thompson/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.