Legal Opinion
State v. Phillips
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 12, 1994No. 1 CA-CR 93-0417PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EHRLICH, Judge.
The defendant appeals her conviction and sentence under Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 28-692(A)(3), claiming that the statute is unconstitutional. For the following reasons, we affirm the conviction and sentence.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The facts are not in dispute. On March 30, 1992, a Phoenix police officer responded to a traffic accident which involved the defendant. At the scene of the accident, the officer noted that the defendant smelled of alcohol, slurred her speech, had watery eyes and seemed significantly impaired. He therefore…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Clark v. JeterSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Chevron Chemical Co. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Pima County Juvenile Appeal No. 74802-2Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Peyote Way Church of God, Inc. v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Appleby v. RechtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
- State of Iowa v. Erik Milton ChildsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- State of Arizona Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Hrach ShilgevorkyanArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- Love v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- People v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.