State v. George

OPINION

HOWE, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Lori Dawn Bayless George appeals her conviction and sentence for driving while under the influence of intoxicating drugs. She argues that Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) § 28-1381(A)(l) is unconstitutionally vague as applied to her. Finding no error, we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 On August 14, 2009, at approximately 5:30 p.m., a witness observed George drive out of a shopping plaza’s parking lot. According to the witness, George made a wide right turn and crossed traffic lanes before striking a curb “very hard[,] ... kicking up a lot of dirt…