State ex rel. Montgomery v. Harris
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Justice BRUTINEL,
opinion of the Court.
¶ 1 Arizona Revised Statutes § 28-1381(A)(3) makes it unlawful for a driver to be in actual physical control of a vehicle if there is “any drug defined in [A.R.S.] § 13-3401 or its metabolite in the person’s body.” We are asked to determine whether the phrase “its metabolite” includes Carboxy-Tetrahydroeannabinol (“Carboxy-THC”), a non-impairing metabolite of Cannabis,1 a proscribed drug listed in § 13-3401. We conclude that it does not.
*100I.
¶ 2 Police stopped a vehicle driven by Hrach Shilgevorkyan for speeding and making unsafe lane changes. Suspecting…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles HolleArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- Cecilia M Lewis Et Vir v. Ray C Debord Et UxArizona Supreme Court · 2015
- State of Arizona v. Christepher E. LuaArizona Supreme Court · 2015
- Jorge Romero-Millan v. William BarrArizona Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. Chalice Renee ZeitnerArizona Supreme Court · 2019
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.