Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Montgomery v. Harris

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 2014No. CV-13-0056-PRPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice BRUTINEL,

opinion of the Court.

¶ 1 Arizona Revised Statutes § 28-1381(A)(3) makes it unlawful for a driver to be in actual physical control of a vehicle if there is “any drug defined in [A.R.S.] § 13-3401 or its metabolite in the person’s body.” We are asked to determine whether the phrase “its metabolite” includes Carboxy-Tetrahydroeannabinol (“Carboxy-THC”), a non-impairing metabolite of Cannabis,1 a proscribed drug listed in § 13-3401. We conclude that it does not.

*100I.

¶ 2 Police stopped a vehicle driven by Hrach Shilgevorkyan for speeding and making unsafe lane changes. Suspecting…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles HolleArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Cecilia M Lewis Et Vir v. Ray C Debord Et UxArizona Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State of Arizona v. Christepher E. LuaArizona Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Jorge Romero-Millan v. William BarrArizona Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State v. Chalice Renee ZeitnerArizona Supreme Court · 2019

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API