Legal Opinion
People v. BOULTINGHOUSE
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 2005No. G033611PublishedCited by 4 opinions
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION *]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEDSWORTH, J,
Christopher Michael Boultinghouse was convicted of possessing steroids for personal use and possessing for sale gammabutyrolactone (GBL), which is listed as a controlled substance under California law. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11054, subd. (e)(3).) Because GBL is not listed as a controlled substance under federal law, Boultinghouse claims his GBL conviction violates the supremacy clause of the federal Constitution. He also alleges prosecutorial misconduct, as well as evidentiary and sentencing error. Finding no basis to disturb the judgment, we affirm.
On March 21, 2002,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Gonzales v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. James R. TurcotteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Mark Fisher, United States of America v. Devon Sutton, A.K.A. Devon Daniel Sutton, United States of America v. Arthur RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- County of San Diego v. San Diego NORMLCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Qualified Patients Assn. v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Boultinghouse v. HallDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
- People v. Yeager-ReimanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024