Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court (Douglass)

California Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1979No. L.A. 31079PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MANUEL, J.

— In this mandate proceeding we must decide whether a violation of Business and Professions Code section 2399.5, which states that it is unprofessional conduct to prescribe, dispense or furnish dangerous drugs without a good faith prior examination and medical *431indication therefor, constitutes a misdemeanor under section 2426 of that code.1 We conclude that it does not.

Real party in interest James Douglass was charged in an amended complaint in the municipal court with numerous violations of section 2399.5. At the close of the prosecution’s case-in-chief in a trial by jury,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mattz v. ArnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Bowland v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Mannheim v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Maben v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Jones v. Lodge at Torrey Pines PartnershipCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API