Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bowland v. Municipal Court

California Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1976No. S.F. 23484PublishedCited by 174 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHARDSON, J.

Plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of Business and Professions Code section 2141, which prohibits the unlicensed practice of the healing arts. (Unless otherwise indicated, all statutoiy references are to the Business and Professions Code.) They are charged with violations of section 2141 in that as unlicensed persons they have practiced or held themselves out as practicing midwifery. The plaintiffs, defendants in the criminal proceedings pending against them in the Municipal Court of Santa Cruz County Judicial District, interposed a demurrer to the second amended…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by174 opinions

  1. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. MemroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

169 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API