Legal Opinion

Mattz v. Arnett

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 11, 1973No. 71-1182PublishedCited by 282 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun

Our decision in this case turns on the resolution of the narrow question whether the Klamath River Indian Reservation in northern California was terminated by Act of Congress or whether it remains “Indian country,” within the meaning of 18 U. S. C. § 1151. When established, the reservation was described as “a strip of territory commencing at the Pacific Ocean and extending 1 mile in width on each side of the Klamath River” for a distance of approximately 20 miles, encompassing an area not exceeding 25,000 acres. This description is taken from President Franklin Pierce’s Executive Order issued…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Southwestern Cable Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Seymour v. Superintendent of Washington State PenitentiarySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Wilbur v. United States Ex Rel. KadrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. United States v. CelestineSupreme Court of the United States · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by282 opinions

  1. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Bryan v. Itasca CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. McGirt v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  5. DeCoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

277 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API