Legal Opinion

Royal Indemnity Co. v. Security Truck Lines

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 18, 1963No. Civ. 20476PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.

Appellant, Royal Indemnity Company, an insurance carrier, brought action against the respondent, Security Truck Lines (hereafter referred to as Security), to recover moneys paid by appellant to its insured, General Petroleum Corporation (hereafter referred to as General Petroleum), for the replacement of a sign at a gasoline service station located on U.S. Highway 101 in Laytonville, California. The complaint alleged that on May 4, 1957, the sign at General Petroleum’s Laytonville station was irreparably damaged by a truck owned by the respondent and operated by its employee, George A. Clark.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fifield Manor v. FinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Meyers v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Terry Trading Corp. v. BarskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Offer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. St. Louis Natl. Bank v. GayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Patent Scaffolding Co. v. William Simpson Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Travelers Indemnity Company v. ChumbleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Tutor-Saliba Corp.California Supreme Court · 1998
  4. ZF Micro Devices, Inc. v. TAT Capital Partners, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Allianz Insurance Co. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API