Legal Opinion

Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Tutor-Saliba Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1998No. S058283PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

A subcontractor’s workers’ compensation insurance carrier brought an action against the general contractor to recover compensation benefits paid to the subcontractor’s employee. The issue in this case is whether an express provision for attorney fees in the contract between the general contractor and the subcontractor (the injured worker’s employer) applies to permit recovery of fees in the action between the insurance carrier and the general contractor. The Court of Appeal concluded that attorney fees are not available. We disagree, and therefore reverse its judgment.

I. Facts…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Privette v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. La Jolla Beach & Tennis Club, Inc. v. Industrial Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Aceves v. Regal Pale Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Western Steamship Lines, Inc. v. San Pedro Peninsula HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hearn Pacific Corp. v. Second Generation Roofing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Steadfast Ins. Co. v. Greenwich Ins. Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Casa Eva I Homeowners Ass'n v. Ani Construction & Tile, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. NipponKoa Ins. Co. v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API