Legal Opinion

ZF Micro Devices, Inc. v. TAT Capital Partners, Ltd.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 2016No. H040776PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WALSH, J. *

This is the third chapter of Silicon Valley lihgation spanning more than 14 years involving a microchip company, ZF Micro Devices, Inc. (ZF Devices), and its successor, ZF Micro Solutions, Inc. (ZF Solutions). The successor company sued National Semiconductor Corporation (NSC)—ZF Devices’ foundry—and obtained a $20 million settlement in 2004. Afterwards, venture capital firms that had invested in ZF Devices, including TAT Capital Partners, Ltd. (TAT), sued ZF Soluhons and others for fraudulent transfer of the NSC settlement proceeds. The investors prevailed at trial in 2010…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Blaser v. State Teachers' Retirement System, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Rasmussen v. Lazarus, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Better Meat Co. v. Emergy, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2022
  4. Blaser v. State Teachers' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. Blaser v. State Teachers' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API