St. Louis Natl. Bank v. Gay
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San-Diego County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
On February 4,1891, defendant, Gay, made and delivered to D. D. Dare two non-negotiable notes, each for two thousand five hundred dollars and interest, and each payable one year after date. On February 24,1891, Dare assigned these notes to the plaintiff. On February 12, 1891, Dare made and delivered to J. M. Collins his negotiable promissory note for five thousand dollars and interest, payable one year after date; and on October 21, 1891, said note to Collins was purchased by and regularly assigned to defendant. At the time of this purchase defendant had no notice that his note to Dare had…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Myers v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Martin v. . KunzmullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
- Northampton Bank v. BallietSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844
3Cited by28 opinions
- Harrison v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- McKean v. German-American Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Stadler v. First National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1899
- McKenney v. EllsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Haskins v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.