Legal Opinion

Cheveldave v. Tri Palms Unified Owners Ass'n

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided October 3, 2018No. E066461PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER J.

Tri Palms Unified Owners Association (the Association) is a group of homeowners in the Tri-Palms Estates.1 There is a recreation facility adjacent to the Tri-Palms Estates, and homeowners pay a fee for that recreation facility. In 2014, in bankruptcy proceedings, Kort & Scott Financial Group, LLC (K & S) was the successful bidder on the recreation facility. The Association entered into a settlement agreement (the Agreement) with K & S. As a result of the Agreement, some members of the Association were required to pay an increased fee for the recreation facility.

In 2016, Alex…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Mycogen Corp. v. Monsanto Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Park v. Bd. of Trs. of the Cal. State Univ.California Supreme Court · 2017

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lauckhart v. El Macero Homeowners Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2023
  2. People v. BeaudreauxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  3. People v. BeaudreauxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  4. People v. Varela CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Perez v. Blay CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API