Legal Opinion

Perez v. Blay CA4/1

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 18, 2020No. D075751Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 11/18/20 Perez v. Blay CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA MAX PEREZ, D075751 Plaintiff and Appellant, v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2017-00023570- CU-FR-NC) RICHARD J. BLAY et al., Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village Condominium Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Scott v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In Re Estate of FainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. National Secretarial Service, Inc. v. FroehlichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API