Legal Opinion

Lucido v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1990No. S011151PublishedCited by 506 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, C. J.

In this case we decide whether the doctrine of collateral estoppel bars prosecution of petitioner Arasimo Settemo Lucido for indecent exposure (Pen. Code, § 314, subd. 1; further statutory references are to this code unless otherwise indicated). At a probation revocation hearing conducted prior to a criminal trial based on the same underlying conduct, the justice court found that the People failed to prove a violation of probation based on the alleged offense. The People seek review of the Court of Appeal judgment ordering the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandate…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by506 opinions

  1. People v. AriasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. ReadyLink Healthcare, Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance FundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Mycogen Corp. v. Monsanto Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
  4. DKN Holdings LLC v. FaerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Vandenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

501 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API