Legal Opinion

Radebaugh v. Citizens Trust & Savings Bank

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division

Decided October 19, 1925Published

1Opinion of the CourtKinkead, J.

The case is submitted upon a motion for judgment for nonsuit at the close of plaintiff’s evidence. Defendant relies upon the contract made by the parties wherein it was expressly agreed that the bank should not be liable in case the property in the box should be misappropriated by any person deputized by the plaintiff, to have access to the same. Plaintiff made written acknowledgment of receipt of two keys. The contract stipulated that the bank shall not be liable to Radebaugh in event of misappropria*348tion by the other or others or any person deputized by plaintiff, the undersigned, -who…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Taylor v. CrookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  3. Dirks v. California Safe Deposit & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Nash v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1853

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API