Bagnall v. Roach
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
Julia King died in the city and county of San Francisco on the 8th of April, 1883. The defendant Roach, public administrator, obtained letters of administration on her estate.
The deceased left some money deposited in the Hibernia Savings Bank in her own name; the amount does not appear.
The plaintiff claims that at least a thousand dollars of this money belongs to him. On the 18th of May, 1883, he presented his claim in due form, and duly verified, to the defendant, as administrator, for allowance; but the defendant refused to allow the same, or any part thereof.
At the trial plaintiff expected…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Fawkes v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Nicholson v. MetcalfMontana Supreme Court · 1904
- Dirks v. California Safe Deposit & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
- Rivero v. HernándezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.