Hosang v. Minor
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.
The plaintiffs, appellants herein, as lessors under a written lease, brought this action against the defendant, respondent herein, as lessee, to collect rental allegedly due thereunder, and also for damages.
The subject lease was for a two-year term commencing January 1, 1956; covered certain farm property; provided for semiannual rental payments, i.e., on January 1st and July 1st of each year; and contained the following provisions, which are basic to the principal issue for determination on this appeal, to wit:
“It is agreed and understood that there are two wells located on the property…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Medico-Dental Building Co. v. Horton & ConverseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Masser v. the London Operating Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Arnold v. KrigbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Melone v. RuffinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Thompson v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Schulman v. VeraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Gostin v. State Farm InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964