Legal Opinion

Hosang v. Minor

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1962No. Civ. 6684PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

The plaintiffs, appellants herein, as lessors under a written lease, brought this action against the defendant, respondent herein, as lessee, to collect rental allegedly due thereunder, and also for damages.

The subject lease was for a two-year term commencing January 1, 1956; covered certain farm property; provided for semiannual rental payments, i.e., on January 1st and July 1st of each year; and contained the following provisions, which are basic to the principal issue for determination on this appeal, to wit:

“It is agreed and understood that there are two wells located on the property…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Medico-Dental Building Co. v. Horton & ConverseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Masser v. the London Operating Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. Arnold v. KrigbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Melone v. RuffinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. Schulman v. VeraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Gostin v. State Farm InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API