Legal Opinion

Universal Ideas Corp. v. Esty

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 9, 1984No. 16-82-04580; CA A27835PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Plaintiff (Universal) appeals from a judgment dismissing its claim against defendant (Esty) for liquidated damages resulting from breach of an alleged agreement not to compete. The trial court found that Universal was collaterally estopped from maintaining the action by an earlier Linn County decision involving the same parties. We reverse.

Universal, as seller, entered into a written contract with Esty, as purchaser, on October 16,1975. Under the terms of the contract, Universal trained Esty in the operation of its gourmet club business and granted him the exclusive right to use Universal’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Bahler v. FletcherOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Century Home Components, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Far West Landscaping, Inc. v. Pacific Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Pic Inc. v. Prescon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schlenkerman v. Goldbronn (In Re Goldbronn)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2001
  2. Universal Ideas Corp. v. EstyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Johnson v. BabcockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. State v. ManwillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. First Interstate Bank v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API