Legal Opinion

Crocker Nat. Bank of San Francisco v. Say

California Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1930No. Docket No. S.F. 13132PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHENK, J.—

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants in an action on the following promissory note:

“$56,214.79 San Francisco, Cal. June 4, 1923.
“On demand, and if no demand be made, then six months after date, for value received in gold coin of the Government of the United States, I, we, or either of us, jointly or severally, promise to pay to the order of Crocker National Bank of San Francisco at its banking house in the city, Fifty-six thousand two hundred fourteen and 79/100 dollars, with interest from date at the rate of six per cent per annum, until paid, payable…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Geary Street, Park & Ocean Railroad v. RolphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. First National Bank v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Hobson v. HassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Bank of Orland v. HarlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Sayre v. NicholsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Seth v. Lew HingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Brunzell v. WoodburyNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Van Haaren v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Paillet v. VromanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Casner v. San Diego Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API