Van Haaren v. Whitmore
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment for the balance due on a promissory note secured by a deed of trust. The trial court gave judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the balance alleged to be due on the note. and the defendants have appealed.
The record discloses that two of the defendants, Jennie Whitmore and Dr. Charles B. Moon, entered into a written contract with the plaintiff on the 21st of October, 1929, to purchase from her a parcel of real property improved with an apartment house and to pay her twelve thousand dollars therefor, eighteen hundred dollars in cash, and the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hobson v. HassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Lindemann v. CoryellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Citizens' Bank of Los Angeles v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Crocker Nat. Bank of San Francisco v. SayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Williams v. SilversteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lipshie v. Tracy Investment Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1977
- Hollywood National Bank v. International Business MacHines Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1974
- Brunzell v. WoodburyNevada Supreme Court · 1969
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. GoldsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Hess v. MoodeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.