Legal Opinion

Pearce v. the Territory of Oklahoma

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 18, 1902PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from the District Court of Payne County; before John E. BurfordTrial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by tbe conrt by

Hainer, J.:

The appellant was convicted in the district court of Payne county of the crime of grand larceny and sentenced to the penitentiary for five years. From this judgment and sentence he appeals to this court.

The first error assigned is that the court erred in overruling the motion for a continuance of the cause. The indictment in this case was returned on May 8, 1899. On May 9 the defendant was arraigned and on the following day entered a plea of not guilty. On May 11 the defendant made an application for a continuance of the cause for the term on account of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Drury v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  2. Hyde v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  3. Hankins v. IngolsIndiana Supreme Court · 1835
  4. Patswald v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  5. Watson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1886

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. State v. RileyUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Sanditen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. State v. EllrichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API