Legal Opinion

Drury v. Territory of Oklahoma

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 8, 1900PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error from the District Court of Garfield Countyj before John L. McAtee, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burford, C. J.:

The defendant, Drury, and one Cran-dall, were tried and convicted for the crime of murder. Drury appeals to this court. The first contention of. plaintiff in error is that the court erred in overruling the demurrer to the indictment. The indictment, after the formal parts, charges as follows-:

“That John W. Crandall and Joseph Drury, late of said county, on the fourth day of February, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and ninety-eight, in the said county of Garfield, Territory of Oklahoma, in an-d upon on-e John McCoy, then and there…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Crocket v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  3. White v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Wade v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. State v. HessianSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Wilkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Byrne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Collins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1918

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API