Legal Opinion
Sanditen v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided October 13, 1921No. A-3580PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBessey, J.
On January 6, 1919, M. Sanditen, plaintiff in error, hereinafter designated the defendant, was informed against in the superior court of Okmulgee county for the larceny'of eight joints of 6% pipe or casing, of the value of $243, accomplished by fraud and stealth, and the property of • and by the verdict of the jury his punishment was fixed at the White Rock Oil & Gas Company. He was found guilty, five years in the state penitentiary.
The defendant in his testimony claims that he innocently •sold the pipe or oil easing in question for Sam Foster, believing that it belonged to Foster, or that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex Parte HunnicuttCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Richardson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
- State v. RozeboomSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Commonwealth v. BarryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Stokley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Forester v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
- Payne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922
- Scharman v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1926
- Yeager v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.