Hankins v. Ingols
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Fayette Circuit Court:
1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.
An execution in favour of Hankins and Mount against Weaver, was levied on a spinning machine in Weaver’s possession. Ingols filed with the justice, who had issued the execution, a claim to the machine as his property. He also filed an affidavit; stating that “ the above claim was true in substance and matter of fact, to the best of his belief.” *36The triors, under the statute of 1831, found the property to be Weaver’s and subject to the execution. The justice entered a judgment on the verdict; and stated in his judgment that the property, was valued, by agreement of the parties, at 200…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hamilton v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Hall v. TuttleNew York Supreme Court · 1832
3Cited by8 opinions
- Quarl v. AbbettIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Walton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
- Fowler v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- State v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
- Pearce v. the Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.