Legal Opinion

Hankins v. Ingols

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1835PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from the Fayette Circuit Court:

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

An execution in favour of Hankins and Mount against Weaver, was levied on a spinning machine in Weaver’s possession. Ingols filed with the justice, who had issued the execution, a claim to the machine as his property. He also filed an affidavit; stating that “ the above claim was true in substance and matter of fact, to the best of his belief.” *36The triors, under the statute of 1831, found the property to be Weaver’s and subject to the execution. The justice entered a judgment on the verdict; and stated in his judgment that the property, was valued, by agreement of the parties, at 200…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Hall v. TuttleNew York Supreme Court · 1832

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Quarl v. AbbettIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Walton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  3. Fowler v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  4. State v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
  5. Pearce v. the Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API