Legal Opinion

Sellmer v. Ruen

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1989No. 17228PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the Industrial Commission holding that claimant-appellant Sellmer was injured while engaged in an agricultural pursuit, and hence not covered under the strictures of the workman’s compensation statutes, I.C. § 72-212(8). We affirm.

Claimant was employed by Ruen Farms, Inc., which insofar as this appeal is concerned, operates two potato “cellars” or warehouses, one located on Ruen Farm properties, and the other located in Clark Fork, Idaho. Ruen Farms raises and harvests potatoes which are first located in a cellar on the farm, and later…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Cook v. MasseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Jane Doe v. James D. Hodgson, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  4. Romero v. HodgsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
  5. Manning v. Win Her Stables, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Idaho State Insurance Fund v. Van TineIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Tupper v. State Farm InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Riggs v. Estate of StandleeIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Becerril v. CallIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Sellmer v. RuenIdaho Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API