Tupper v. State Farm Insurance
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SILAK, Justice.
Appellant Barbara Tupper (Tupper) appeals from a decision of the Industrial Com mission (Commission) denying worker’s compensation benefits for severe pain she suffered due to answering the telephone in her job as a phone receptionist for respondent State Farm Insurance (State Farm). We affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On November 2, 1995, Tupper filed a worker’s compensation complaint with the Commission seeking medical benefits for pain to her left shoulder and upper back due to the repetitive use of her left arm while answering the telephone for her employer State Farm.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- George W. Watkins Family v. MessengerIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Davaz v. Priest River Glass Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994
- Langley v. State, Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
- Swanson v. Kraft, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1989
- Wanke v. Ziebarth Const. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1948
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Idaho State Insurance Fund v. Van TineIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Struhs v. Protection Technologies, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Rivas v. K.C. LoggingIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- Konvalinka v. Bonneville CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- Mulder v. Liberty Northwest InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.