Jane Doe v. James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:
Nine migrant agricultural workers, protected by pseudonyms, challenge the constitutionality of provisions in various federal and state statutes which operate to exclude them and others so situated from the beneficial provisions of social legislation in such areas as unemployment compensation, minimum hours and wages, social security and workmen’s compensation. 1 Plaintiffs’ complaint sought the convening of a three-judge court, a declaratory judgment, and “appropriate equitable relief in the nature of injunction or mandamus enforcing plaintiffs’ rights and defendants’…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Port Authority Bondholders Protective Committee, Henry W. Klein, Alvin S. Lane, Adele W. Ginsberg and Morris L. Lewy v. Port of New York AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Bruce Boraas v. The Village of Belle Terre, an Incorporated MunicipalityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- City of New York v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Arlene Mattern, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Cordero v. Triple A Machine ShopCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Bartholomew v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Adams v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.