Legal Opinion

Becerril v. Call

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1995No. 21339PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Justice.

I

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

Elisio Becerril (Becerril) appeals from a decision of the Industrial Commission (the Commission) holding that his worker’s compensation claim against Brent Call d.b.a. Call Farms (Call Farms) was barred by the agricultural exemption of Idaho Code § 72-212(8) (Supp.1995).

After injuring his back while working for his employer, Becerril filed a complaint seeking worker’s compensation benefits asserting that his employer, Call Farms, was not exempt from providing coverage under the agricultural exemption.

The Commission assigned the matter to a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cook v. MasseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Tuma v. KostermanIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Lesperance v. CooperIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Sellmer v. RuenIdaho Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hall v. Pristine Springs, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API