Legal Opinion
Romero v. Hodgson
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 20, 1970No. 50213-ACWPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
2Per curiam
Plaintiffs herein attack the exclusion, by both California and federal statutes, of agricultural labor from the definition of “employment” for the purposes of unemployment compensation. 26 U.S.C. § 3306(c) (1), (k); Calif.Unempl.Ins.Code, §§ 625-627. Essentially, they argue that this exclusion, when considered in light of the economic and social changes since the enactment of the Federal Unemployment Tax Act, constitutes “invidious discrimination” within the meaning of the due process and equal protection clauses of the Constitution.
The state and federal defendants…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by35 opinions
- Harding v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Jane Doe v. James D. Hodgson, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Distinctive Printing & Packaging Co. v. CoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Keough v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Caldis v. Board of County Commissioners, Grand Forks CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.