Legal Opinion

Phipps v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1995No. 26038PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

On January 10, 1994, the State filed a criminal complaint charging David Phipps with one count of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor (“DUI”), third offense, a felony as defined by NRS 484.3792(l)(c). The complaint alleged that Phipps had two prior DUI convictions in the past seven years.

At the preliminary hearing, the court, citing Pfohlman v. State, 107 Nev. 552, 554, 816 P.2d 450-51 (1991), determined that one of the prior convictions could not be considered for enhancement purposes because the offense on which the conviction was based took place over seven years ago.…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. TennerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. McCullough v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Emmons v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Dressler v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. SanfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Parsons v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Ronning v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State, Department of Motor Vehicles & Public Safety v. PaulNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Wijesekera (Royce) v. Dist. Ct. (State)Nevada Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API