Legal Opinion

McCullough v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1983No. 13838PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

A jury found appellant Joseph Lewis McCullough guilty of possession of a controlled substance and possession of stolen property. Among other contentions, McCullough argues on appeal that the jury was prejudicially misinformed regarding the concept of reasonable doubt, because the district judge made several attempts to quantify reasonable doubt during the voir dire examination of the jurors and also delivered an improper jury instruction on the subject. A review of the authorities and the record leads us to agree with appellant, and we therefore reverse.

THE FACTS

McCullough was charged…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Richard Dunn v. Everett I. Perrin, Jr., Laurence Black v. Edward CoxCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  5. State v. AubertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by64 opinions

  1. Kelly Koerner v. George A. GrigasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Petrocelli v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Lord v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Emmons v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. DelVecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API